Home

Background

Continuity vs Discontinuity

Definition of
Quantum Motion

Experiment Descriptions

Background

Arrangement 1

Arrangement 2

Notes on Flash Unit

Discussion on Theory of Discontinuous Motion

The Nature and Fundamental Principles of Motion

Abrupt Limitation of Form, Exclusive Location


Purchase a Book


About Wilfrid Boisvert

Feedback

Also by this author:
The Principles of Reality

 

Discussion

Continuous Motion vs Discontinuous Motion

Every day we experience and observe motion. We see objects move from one place to another; time appears to flow smoothly from past to present to future. Action appears to happen smoothly and continuously -- an appearance that has been accepted a priori, by philosophers and scientists since the beginning of civilization.

But what if this fundamental assumption about motion is wrong? What if our senses have been tricked? A movie film rolls at 24 frames per second, and the motion we perceive on the screen appears perfectly smooth and continuous. But the film is actually countless still images moving past our eyes faster than we can process them as separate entities. What if each state of reality, each perfectly defined and discrete moment of time, is affecting us similarly?

Throughout history, the nature of motion has remained abstract and undefinable—its definition lacking scientific or philosophical consensus. Science well understands the dynamics, or the effects, of motion but do we understand the "how and why" of motion at a fundamental level; that is, the underlying mechanics of motion?

The paradox of continuity in time and motion

Remarkably, the concept of continuous motion has never been proven as a scientific fact. Serious problems, or paradoxes, around continuous motion have been documented for centuries. Two thousand years ago the philosopher Zeno of Elea questioned why things move when, logically, they should not. His paradoxes challenge logic and science to this day.

As a scientist and logistician, Wilfrid Boisvert could not accept the premise that nature creates paradoxes. If nature appears paradoxical it must be that we do not understand some very fundamental principle of reality -- in this case the true nature of time, space and motion.

Wilfrid and Adrien (Wilfrid's son) Boisvert spent over 30 years of their lives developing and refining the photographic techniques behind the photos in these books and website. They are only a small sampling of the hundreds of similar photos he took over the years. This website describes the relatively simple techniques he used to capture the images. The implications of this discovery are fully developed and presented in Boisvert's philosophical treatise, The Principles of Reality.

However these photos reveal the first real evidence that motion may be discontinuous and instantaneous, and that things may not be what we have been led to believe.


The Discontinuity of Motion by Wilfrid Boisvert

Copyright 1996: G. Smith