Lords of the Earth
Now Naaman was commander of the army of the king of Aram. He was a great
man in the sight of his master and highly regarded,
because through him the LORD had given victory to Aram. He was a valiant
soldier, but he had leprosy. 2 Kings 5:1
Have you been following the economy hearings in Washington D.C.? Apart
from the seriousness and anxiety which we might feel about it, the drama
has been riveting. Well, ok, maybe not riveting, but remarkable.
When in your memory have the heads of industry, commerce and government
been paraded before the people's representatives and made to sit humbly while
their noses are rubbed in the messes they have created?
I don't think I have ever seen anything like it. Maybe the Watergate hearings
of the mid 1970's came close. But that was strictly an in-house scandal, even
if it did lead to the resignation of a president.
It has been quite a spectacle watching the heads of industry, finance and
even government bureaucrats forced to sit and be questioned and ridiculed
for their lack of competence. What a drama.
These are the people Thomas Wolfe called "Masters of the Universe" in his
novel, Bonfire of the Vanities.
And something inside cheers to see the mighty brought down to earth, even
if for a few weeks.
Mark it on your calendars. We may never see this again in our lifetime.
This is historic.
And what precisely does any of this have to do with the healing of a Syrian
leper named Naaman?
The answer is nothing at all, and everything.
There is of course no connection whatsoever between the two events.
Well none except the fact that all occur under the watchful eye of the
Sovereign Lord of the Universe--who, by the way, is more powerful by far
than mere Lords of the Earth. And that really is the point.
The time of Elisha, when the story takes place is a time when kings and
generals ruled the earth like Tyrannosaurus Rex.
It is a time when ordinary people are of no consequence at all. There were
no parliaments or congressional hearings to call them to account. They ruled
above the normal limits of power we take for granted.
One of the themes of scripture is that while mankind
might stand enthralled of the power of kings, God does not.
This empowers people who feel insignificant. The writings of the early
historians of Samuel, Kings and the Chronicles are in a sense, a form of
civil disobedience. The writer tells the story of Ahab and Jezebel and their
connivance to murder an ordinary man, Naboth, and take his vineyard for their
own.
Kings don’t blink twice at the Naboth’s of the earth,
but God takes notice and the prophet denounces their treachery—with impunity.
It is this radical view of history that empowered people like Martin Luther
King Jr. to believe that God really was on the side of the ordinary, rather
than in allegiance with the powerful, and who empowers the ordinary to stand
against the powerful.
Who can stand and pronounce judgments on kings
and queens?
The prophets of God, that’s who.
And no one did it better than Elijah or his pupil, Elisha.
But before we get all misty-eyed over God as champion
of the poor, Jesus reminds us of this healing in one of His sermons.
He asks, "were there not many lepers in Israel in the time of Elisha? And
yet God only healed one person--Naaman and Syrian".
Wait a minute.
Isn't this a story of the comeuppance of the arrogant?
Yes it is.
But it is more than a political drama.
In the end it says God could care less about politics, either of the rich
or the poor for that matter.
It says that those who employ the methods of this world will not find an
ally in the almighty. It is only when we ally ourselves to the almighty that
our methods have any utility.
Here is what happens:
Naaman the Syrian general, and hero, has leprosy.
In an interesting note, the writer says that through Naaman, God gave victory
to Syria.
Interesting since Syria was often at war with Israel. Isn't God supposed
to be on Israel's side?
In fact it was one of those raiding parties which captured a Hebrew girl
and brought her back to Damascus where she serves as a household slave to
Naaman's wife. This puts her on the pecking order just above the cat. And
depending on how Naaman's wife felt about cats, maybe not even that high.
But when nothing else is working, this slave girl steps
in and says, "there is a prophet in Israel who I am sure could heal Naaman."
That's it.
That's all she says. From then on, she has no more part in the drama and
no doubt spent the rest of her time emptying chamber pots. But this total
nobody is used by God in a unique and remarkable miracle of God. Unique because
Jesus reminds us no other lepers were healed. But she has something no one
else on the scene possesses: she has a simple faith in God and the servant
of God. That's it. Oh yes, and a willingness to say so.
Not much is it?
Not much compared to the power of the Lords of the Earth.
But a whole lot more effective, it turns out.
Naaman tells the king of Syria.
The king, does what kings do. He writes to the king of Israel--his erstwhile
on and off enemy.
Powerful people use the normal channels that have always worked. They know
power and politics, and expect that these tried and true tools will not fail
them.
The king of Israel reads the letter and is dismayed.
He is sure the king of Syria is trying to provoke a fight.
Not for a moment does he consider Elisha. He knows who Elisha is because
he has had dealings with him, but he interprets this totally on the level
of politics and concludes it is an attempt to provoke war.
He never thinks of Elisha. Why would he? Who after all is king?
But he too is powerless.
Elisha hears of the king's dismay and says in effect,
"keep your shirt on. Send him to me."
Elisha has had dealings with the king and they are mostly disrespectful.
Elisha has no use for him at all and lets him know so.
And he gets away with it.
You see why these books were revolutionary and seditious. And why tyrants
would love to ban them.
Any book that teaches you God has no respect for kings or powers is dangerous.
So Naaman goes to Elisha's home, laden with gifts.
Naaman believes in magic, and he believes in his own ability to do something
for the magician. Quid pro quo.
I do for you, you do for me.
And I am a rich and powerful man, so I can do a lot for you.
But Elisha shows absolutely no interest in what Naaman can do for him.
And he has no interest in doing anything particular for Naaman, in the
way Naaman was expecting.
He shows no regard for Naaman's status and doesn't even come out of the
house.
He sends his servant to Naaman. A real sign of disrespect in Naaman's eyes.
He tells the servant to tell Naaman to go wash seven times in the Jordan
and he will be cured.
Naaman is furious.
French theologian Jacques Ellul writes about Naaman:
Naaman, then, is
angry because he is not shown due respect, because he is mocked, because he
has not been politely treated, and because the man of God has not acted as
every proper magician ought to act. Naaman belongs to the secular order. He
doubts, and he has reason to doubt, since what is asked of him is in effect
absurd. According to his situation, according to his intelligence, and according
to his experience, the saying of Elisha is worthless.1.
The kings of Syria, and of Israel all know how things are done. But Elisha
will not play along and gives Naaman instructions that seem worthless. Wash
in the Jordan when we have perfectly good rivers in Damascus? He's nuts!
Naaman is thinking the healing is the property of the prophet or magician
or some special properties in the water.
In fact the water has nothing at all to do with it. God could have said
through Elisha to go stand on one foot and read from the Torah. The "what"
that God requests makes sense in God's view, and that is all that is germane.
The fact they make no sense to Naaman is beside the point.
Jacques Ellul says further:
It is always thus when the Word of God comes
to us. A priori it necessarily seems to be absurd, for it is of a different
order. And our conversion does not consist in assimilating this Word so that
it becomes reasonable. The absurd element persists, but from this moment
what becomes absurd is the world, its wisdom, its intelligence, its power,
its politics, its experience. For the foolishness of God is wiser than the
wisdom of men. After Naaman’s conversion what will seem absurd and ridiculous
to him will be the manners, the customs, and the religion of Syria.2.
The writer of 2 Kings says that in his rage, Naaman listens to his servants
who say to him:
"Why not try it? What do you have to lose and its simple enough."
Naaman has no eyes to see that there is a greater power at work, but he
can listen to simple reasoning and he goes and does as Elisha has told him
to and is healed.
At this point, I sit and think a bit.
Naaman has called God's instructions foolishness, but God heals him anyway
once he goes and washes.
And I think to myself: So it seems that, at least here, what God is looking
for is not a flash of spiritual insight, not a sudden dawning of existential
or theological truth.
What God is looking for is for Naaman to do what he is told. Apparently
nothing more.
But we are prone to twist ourselves this way and that when it comes to
just following instructions.
Partly because we think we know how God ought to answer our prayers.
We know what the answer should look like and are not so dissimilar from
Naaman who knew what a healing should look like.
Naaman shows us that there is a lot to be said for just following interactions,
and letting God look after the rest.
Doesn't Jesus say, "seek first the righteousness of the kingdom of God,
and God will look after everything else"?
I think so.
But simple answers don't coddle our theories of complexity that we concoct.
Every riveter on the Golden Gate Bridge was not given the engineer's calculations
every time he was given a rivet to drive home.
He was given his simple piece to do and expected to do it.
The slave girl did hers.
Elisha did his part, as did his servants.
And so did Naaman's servants when they pointed out the obvious--maybe it
doesn't make sense, but why not try it--what do you have to lose?
And Naaman did his part by going to the river and washing.
When Jesus healed, to one he said take up your bed and walk; to another,
go wash in the pool of Siloam; and for another he put his fingers into his
ears and the man heard. On another occasion he said to ten lepers, "go show
yourselves to the priest" and on the way they were healed. There was no magic
in the formula or the mud. The healing was in the faith that led to obedience.
More to the point, the healing was in the sovereign power of God to heal
whom He chose to heal.
And that is the point.
Lords of the Earth think they have the power to act. And they do, to a
point.
but time and circumstance come to us all when even a king can't help you.
But the sovereign God of all is the lord over all.
What He tells us may not make sense to our ears.
But maybe Naaman's servants really had it right.
Why not just follow God's instructions? Insight really is over rated. Just
do it.
Really, what do you have to lose?
Just a little sidelight.
We would expect Naaman to return to Damascus a changed man, right?
In some ways he is. He takes back some dirt from Israel so he can worship
the God is Israel on his own turf.
But Naaman is still Naaman the general and historically we know Syria went
to war with Israel again and defeated them.
God's outcomes are not our outcomes, much as we wish they would be so.
Still, what do you have to lose?
Do what you know God is saying to you today.
Faith will probably follow in its own time.
Preached February 15, 2009
Dr. Harold McNabb
West Shore Presbyterian Church
Victoria, British Columbia
Notes
1. Jacques Ellul, The
Politics of God and the Politics of Man.
2. Ibid
Resources Consulted
Jacques Ellul, The Politics
of God and the Politics of Man, The book was prepared for Religion
Online by William E. Chapman.
Walter Bruggemann, Finally Comes the
Poet, Fortress Press, 1989
Walter Bruggemann, Old Testament: The
Canon and Christian Imagination, Westminster John Knox Press, 2003
Return to Main Sermon Page
Email Harold McNabb