| The problem is that this is a huge area where the message (as usual in human problems) is that there are no simple solutions. Essentially there are two sides to the problem each of which can masquerade as the whole answer. First there is the religious or moral criterion of what is worthwhile in human life from which comes our conviction about what is right or wrong. The problem with this approach is that if taken by itself it can decline into a "buns for the poor" triviality or else particular economic forces are demonized and one winds up tilting at windmills. The other side of the problem is the practical criterion, namely how do things really work in economics and what sort of changes would produce the effects we are looking for? Taken by itself economic prescriptions assume as self-evident somewhat naive notions about the meaning of human life such as more is always better. The prayer attributed to Reinhold Niebuhr for courage to change the things that should be changed, for strength to endure the things that cannot be changed, and knowledge to know the difference sums up the matter very neatly . |
Here is where I am so far in assembling books on the subject.
|
| I would appreciate any comments from anyone about content or bibliography. I will try to add such comments below as time goes on. |
jwunsch@islandnet.com |